1995-05-03                     Senate Journal                      Page 1479
HB 169                                                                       
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 169(RES) "An Act defining the scope                      
of the responsibility of the Department of Natural Resources for               
regulating the mineral resources of the state" was read the second             
time.                                                                          
                                                                               
Senator Lincoln offered Amendment No. 1 :                                       
                                                                               
Page 1, line 4:                                                                
	Delete "a new subsection"                                                     
	Insert "new subsections"                                                      
                                                                               
                                                                               

1995-05-03                     Senate Journal                      Page 1480
HB 169                                                                       
Page 1, following line 11:                                                     
	Insert a new subsection to read:                                              
	"(c)  Subsection (b) of this section does not alter or                       
diminish the authority of another state agency, a state                        
corporation, the University of Alaska, or a municipality                       
under its laws and regulations."                                               
                                                                               
Senator Lincoln moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 1.                     
Objections were heard.                                                         
                                                                               
The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?"  The roll              
was taken with the following result:                                           
                                                                               
CSHB 169(RES)                                                                  
Second Reading                                                                 
Amendment No. 1                                                                
                                                                               
YEAS:  8   NAYS:  12   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                              
                                                                               
Yeas:  Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln, Salo,                   
Zharoff                                                                        
                                                                               
Nays:  Frank, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce,                    
R.Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson                                   
                                                                               
and so, Amendment No. 1 failed.                                                
                                                                               
Senator Lincoln offered Amendment No. 2 :                                       
                                                                               
Page 1, lines 10 - 11:                                                         
	Delete "and draw upon the mining expertise of the                             
department."                                                                   
	Insert  "the department and draw upon and give due                            
deference to the department's mining expertise."                               
                                                                               
Senator Lincoln moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 2.                     
Senator Sharp objected.                                                        
                                                                               
The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?"  The roll              
was taken with the following result:                                           
                                                                               
                                                                               

1995-05-03                     Senate Journal                      Page 1481
HB 169                                                                       
                                                                               
CSHB 169(RES)                                                                  
Second Reading                                                                 
Amendment No. 2                                                                
                                                                               
YEAS:  10   NAYS:  10   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                             
                                                                               
Yeas:  Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln, R.Phillips,             
Rieger, Salo, Zharoff                                                          
                                                                               
Nays:  Frank, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Sharp,             
Taylor, Torgerson                                                              
                                                                               
and so, Amendment No. 2 failed.                                                
                                                                               
Senators Halford, Phillips, Frank, Sharp, Kelly, Leman, Miller,                
Taylor, Green, Torgerson, Pearce moved and asked unanimous                     
consent that they be shown as cross sponsors on the bill.  Without             
objection, it was so ordered.                                                  
                                                                               
Senator Halford moved that the bill be advanced to third reading and           
placed on final passage.  Senator Duncan objected.                             
                                                                               
The question being: "Shall the bill be advanced to third reading?"             
The roll was taken with the following result:                                  
                                                                               
CSHB 169(RES)                                                                  
Advance from Second to Third Reading?                                          
                                                                               
YEAS:  12   NAYS:  8   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                              
                                                                               
Yeas:  Frank, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce,                    
R.Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson                                   
                                                                               
Nays:  Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln, Salo,                   
Zharoff                                                                        
                                                                               
and so, the bill failed to advance to third reading.                           
                                                                               
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 169(RES) will appear on the May 4                        
calendar.